"History's verdict is all we have left.  And when tomorrow calls today into account, some of us want to say we stood up.  We called out.  We were not silent."
--Leonard Pitts, Jr., "Gestures of Conscience Bring Solace," Baltimore Sun, March 19, 2006

CHRISTOPHER'S CROCODILE TEARS

Print the article

This entry was posted on 10/19/2007 10:45 AM and is filed under uncategorized.


As one who used to advocate strongly for the liberation of Iraq...I have grown coarsened and sickened by the degeneration of the struggle.

In the November Vanity Fair magazine, rah-rah war cheerleader Christopher Hitchens writes a moving tribute to a dead soldier, Mark Daily, killed by an I.E.D. in January in Iraq, called "A Death in the Family."

Apparently, what moved Hitchens to write this loving tribute was his discovery that Daily--a registered Democrat who hailed from a California family who opposed the war--had been moved to join the army and go to Iraq after he read numerous Hitchens-penned pro-war diatribes, full of glowing and romantic and glamorous phrases like LIBERTY and JUSTICE and FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY.

This fact became incontrovertable when Hitchens visited the dead soldier's MySpace page and found links to his own articles under a blogpost entitled "Why I Joined."

So shaken is Hitchens, apparently, by this news that he tracks down the devastated family--two loving parents, siblings, and a young bride...for what?  To apologize?  To find grace and forgiveness?  To be reassured that this young man had a mind of his own and that pro-war rants did not lead him to his death and splatter his blood all over the chickenhawk who glamorized it?

You know what COURSENS AND SICKENS me about all this?

These pasty-faced middle-aged white men who were the loudest and noisiest pro-war advocates HAD NEVER THEMSELVES EVER ACTUALLY SERVED IN ONE.

What makes me SICK is that they are now discovering--to their mutual shock and horror--that THIS IS WAR.

It is not f***ing John Wayne.  It is not f***ing Clint Eastwood.

There IS nothing glamorous or righteous or romantic about war.

They are genuinely surprised to learn that war is horrible and sickening and disgusting.  Sweet young men and women like Mark Daily go over there and get the skin burnt off their bodies and their brains splattered all over the pavement and their hands shot off.  They are forced to kill or be killed.  They are forced to watch dear friends die in horrible ways.

Innocent people die, too.  Poverty-striken people trail along the sides of the road with everything they can carry on their backs; their homes get bombed; their children get blown up.

Somehow these chickenhawk movie-fans who hollered the longest and loudest for our army and Marines to go "liberate" a nation actually believed that it really would be simply a matter of smart bombs taking out a few bad guys and then our boys and girls wading through the flowers and sweets to secure the oil fields for all prosperity.

YEARS LATER they STILL advocate this war, because, like Hitchens, not only have they never fought in one themselves, but neither have their own children.

THEN, something happens.  Something personal.  Suddenly, a boy dies who maybe wouldn't have if it hadn't been for the chickenhawk bloviating of a dipshit who thought war was about waving flags and marching to victory and triumph.

Hitchens describes in moving detail the memorial services for this young man and even, incredibly, the very private moments when his family scattered their boy's ashes on the beach.  Hitchens read Shakespeare aloud to them when it was his turn to speak, but mostly, he cried.

Shakespeare, by the way, did not secure a spot in the literary heavens by writing love sonnets or fantasies or comedies--he became strewn through the stratosphere by his TRAGEDIES, and every single war play he wrote was a tragedy.

Every single soldier or Marines who dies in this miserable endless war IS A TRAGEDY.  Christopher Hitchens might have only just now started to feel the staggering pain of a death of a soldier, but I would like to point out to him that there are three thousand and eight hundred-plus others just like it.

IT IS WAR THAT IS COURSENING AND SICKENING, and anyone who ever had to fight in one will do everything in his or her power to prevent any more brave soldiers and Marines from having to fight in another one, as Colin Powell and Gen. Shinseki tried so futilely to do.

The whole damn country got caught up in war fever, aided and abetted by rantings like Hitchens's, as well as bold graphics and dramatic music and powerful voiceovers glamorizing and romanticizing this epic struggle every night on the evening news.

A few months later, the commander-in-chief put on a warrior-costume and marched across a movie set to pronounce this glorious conquest ACCOMPLISHED.

He never fought in a real war either.  Neither did his secretary of state or any of the war's other architchects.  Hell, half the generals who did the Pentagon-planning never really fought in war either, because this country had been at peace, for the most part, for an entire generation.  All they could remember was the sterile, painless Gulf War and what a great boost that was to the media morale, eh?

So quick were they to send other people's children off to fight their glory-war, and to this day, five years later, four thousand more dead, thousands more injured, hundreds of thousands shell-shocked and no end in sight, they are STILL selling their war.

But those of us who have sent loved ones into the breech over and over again and who know the true cost of war find all this lofty talk about "liberation" and "freedom" to be so much bullshit.  This is not a fuzzy-lensed TV commercial.  This is combat.

Ultimately, that's what Hitchen's piece was about.  It was about the idealism of a young man who drank the idealistic Kool-Aid and paid the ultimate price.  His grieving family gave Hitchens the grace and forgiveness he did not deserve, and they are honored as much as their lost boy.

Mark Daily was an outstanding young man of courage and valor.  He rode off willingly to fight in a war he believed was about glory and honor and victory.

But in the end, it was about a fifteen-hundred pound bomb buried under the pavement that ended his life and three others in one heartbreaking split-second.

THAT is war.  THAT is truth.  It's the color of blood, and I hope Christopher Hitchens and all the other chickenhawk cheerleaders drown in it.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 10/21/2007 10:43 AM Barry Considine wrote:
      Excellent, Deanie. Sadly when something is as ugly as war you have to rub some people's noses in it. The time has come to chant "No more war' from every window in America. Like Howard Beale in the movie "Network", It's time to throw open the windows only instead of saying "I'm mad as hell..." We should be yelling "Stop the war. NOW." "Stop the funding of the war. NOW" Stop talking about how much longer we have to stay. We don't have to stay. The mission really has been accomplished and it's time for Iraqi people to take control of the government they got their purple fingers for.
      Reply to this
    • 10/21/2007 11:59 PM Barry Considine wrote:
      The hardest thing about writing is reading. When I read the name Christopher Hitchens, I knew I knew the name, so I looked him up. He was exactly who I thought he was. He's that pompous little Brit who thinks this war is worth it. Just listening to him on talk shows reminds me of many a joke about - you'd be speaking German if not for... Deanie, your right this is a war for the chicken hawks. I proudly tell anyone when the subject of Viet Nam comes up. I was a draft dodger and so were my three older brothers. We didn't enlist in the Air National Guard and then not show up for soldier practice. We were four strapping young men of fierce fighting Irish stock who took advantage of life’s quirks. They were all very legitimate reasons for not serving. Two brothers were classified 1-Y, which meant without a declaration of war you didn't go. Or in other words no police actions for you two. My closest living brother and the one whom I shared a room with beat it strictly by the numbers, his was 240. Me I was 4-F unfit for military service. Why is that, because I had survived paralytic poliomyelitis. I had also played little league baseball, was terror at sand lot football and a gymnast. But I was 4-F and that was all I cared about.
      I care about the people we send over there, so I read Mr. Hitchens article, and knowing who this little peon is I wish the Daily's had thrown him out on his ear like a protestant in a catholic pub. I care about the people home here in the states too. This is why I say the true patriots of this war are every family that watches for e-mails and snail mails. It’s the loved ones who have to look up only to see a military chaplain walking up their sidewalks. It is not for the Christopher Hitchens or the Donald Rumsfelds of the world that people go to war. We didn't go to war for FDR we went to war with FDR, but for the families of the American’s lost at Pearl Harbor. I hope you got to see at least some of Ken Burn's "The War" ,because that is what war is about. It is seeing and doing things that shatters the brain. It is seeing the enemy as a person one day and instinctively killing him the next. I hope that in the near, no, very near future we elect a congress that will have the balls to repeal The War Powers Act and take back what our forefathers gave to them and they alone, the authority to wage war. It is time Congress, do your duty, bring our children home.
      WWII was a singular event in world history. People who love freedom banded together to ensure freedom for all. The thing is despite all that we did, all that we accomplished one of our own allies, turned around, and dwarfed what our enemy had done. Historians can debate the whys and the where fors, of that. What there is no debate about is that the generation that gave me my parents, gave the world a chance to live in peace. My generation showed the world that peaceful revolution isn't a fluke only achievable by Gandhi. We weren't alone either. It was the whole generation
      Reply to this
      1. 10/22/2007 8:23 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        I appreciate your passionate response, and I especially appreciate your honesty.  So few are willing to speak up and say, hey, I didn't go over there and I didn't WANT to go over there and I'm proud that I didn't go over there but I respect those who DID.  People are phonies and say what they think others want to say.  And then, you have those who are one of the TEN TROOPS who provided support services for every ONE combat soldier.  They never left the base, worked at a typewriter or fixed trucks--but to hear them tell it, they were fighting Charlie at every turn.  Like one wisened cop I know said, "Go to a conference of fellow cops, you'd think they were ALL S.W.A.T." 

        But what has triggered my own passion is that I DO come from a military family.  My husband, brother, brother-in-law, and father were ALL Vietnam vets.  Only my husband and his brother saw combat, but my husband brought home a bronze star from his time as a platoon leader with the 101st Airborne, and his brother was shot up and left for dead during his second tour with army Special Forces.

        My dad retired from 20 years with the Marine Corps at the rank of Master Gunnery Sgt.  My OTHER brother-in-law retired from the army Special Forces at the rank of brigadier general.

        My son and all three of his male cousins have served in active-duty combat deployments.  One cousin, who is also army SF, like his dad and uncle, spent some harrowing days in Afghanistan, my son did two combat deployments to Iraq with the Marines, and my other nephew did three combat tours to Iraq with the Marines.  I have ANOTHER nephew there now with an army Stryker brigade in a very bad area.

        SO, when I speak out the way I do, I do it because I believe that these young men and women who step up and volunteer to serve their country in time of war are the best and brightest this nation has to offer, and what I have seen this administration doing to them in the name of "patriotism" is nothing but ABUSE.  And it's not just me saying it.  I have read op-eds written by regular soldiers, sergeants, and captains who have all served combat deployments to Iraq say the same thing.

        To use our troops as stage props behind you, arrayed like flags, (they are ordered not to boo), for stirring speeches while then sending them off to die with insufficient troops, insufficient equipment and body armor, and to send them OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN to fight your miserable photo-op war, and then to PAY YOUR BUDDIES BILLIONS TO SEND OVER PRIVATE ARMIES WITH THE BEST WEAPONS AND EQUIPMENT IN THE WAR FOR OBSCENE AMOUNTS OF MONEY WHILE OUR BOYS AND GIRLS KEEP GETTING KILLED FOR NOTHING--that is reprehensible beyond my meager ability to express.

        Less than one-half of one percent has been asked to fight this Groundhog Day war, and I can tell you, coming from a miitary family, that they are sick to death of war.  Families are falling apart, divorce rates are soaring, family violence and child abuse are spiking, drunken driving and brawling are all up, and these veterans are coming home shattered in mind and body from sheer exhaustion.

        DO NOT talk to me with stirring phrases about liberty and justice and liberation and democracy.  DO NOT wave the flag in my face and accuse me of not "supporting the troops" when the troops themselves are begging for somebody, somewhere to just listen, to just pay attention.

        START SERIOUS TALK ABOUT INSTITUTING A NATIONAL DRAFT and I guarandamntee you, the college campuses will go up in flames, the streets will throng with protest, and this miserable godforsaken war will come to an end.
        Reply to this
        1. 10/22/2007 1:09 PM Barry Considine wrote:
          You are so right about a draft. What else can be guaranteed is that the same chicken hawks that criticize you and I and others who speak out against THIS war, the Iraq war, they will be the same people encouraging police to lock up those damn protesters. We are already at that love or leave it stage we saw in the '60s and '70s. Personally, I believe in fixing things when they're broken. But that is not the norm anymore. TV broke, throw it out get a new one, VCR same thing, a tape gets jammed and out to the trash it goes. Heck most of our society won't even give these things to Goodwill. So why should we be surprised when the chant love it or leave it goes up. You don't love our war then leave our country, like the country belongs only to those who support this stupid war.
          Reply to this
    • 10/22/2007 11:22 AM Fade wrote:
      Powerful post. I came here via a write up about you on Lubbockleft...

      Well, I am very familiar with Hitchens. He has been a very churlish advocate of this war, and then at times contradicting his position as the occupation has gone further and further down the road to hell.

      I just finished your post, so I havent read Hitchens article yet (heading there after I finish this) but I think it is good that he has come face to face with the results of his 'handiwork'. I don't see Hitchens as soulless (likee Kristol or Hume or some of the others). He has written some very fine work, for instance, on the victims of agent orange in Vietnam. I think it is good that he can face this soldiers' death and realize, openly, that his positions have REAL costs. Most of the Bushbot pro-war crowd will never have this epiphany, mired in the concrete of their "convictions", unattached to the costs of war, that they will never have to pay.

      It is a shame that so many of America's youth believe what they are forcefed by these End-justifies-the-means types. It is doubly shameful that these men never had the foresight to comprehend what the "End" would turn out to be in Iraq.

      Especially when so many of us did.
      Reply to this
      1. 10/22/2007 5:26 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        I'm so glad to see you here at Blue Inkblots!  There certainly aren't very many of us in the wilds of west Texas who share these beliefs, and I'd love to see as many of you as possible!

        The Hitchens piece was very respectful and quite moving about the young man--and I did not wish to take away from that in my post--but I do think that, like Lady Macbeth, the man has blood on his hands that can never be washed out, not even by the absolution of the dead soldier's parents.  (I am not proud to confess that, had it been my son, I would not have been so kind.) 

        It's funny; I thought some of my rage over this war had abated, now that my son is safe and it seems that no amount of protest is going to change anything until January of '09--but then I read Hitchen's piece and I just lost it.  I am sick and tired of people passionately defending this war who will not be fighting it, nor will any of THEIR loved ones be risking life and limb repeatedly over there.  Mainstream media steadfastly refuses to highlight the 70% of military families who want to see this war end.  Op-eds written by deployed troops are also almost completely overlooked in favor of full court press for right-wingers who see what they want to see in their photo-op visits in-country and who, again, will not be sending their children to fight it.  Hitchens, in fact, visited the country recently with HIS son.  How nice for them.  Must have been a real bonding experience.  I couldn't go with MY son on account of how I couldn't carry a 90 lb. rucksack on my back for days on end while fighting house to house, room to room or else driving over concealed bombs.  During his second seven-month combat deployment, ALONE, his unit--JUST HIS UNIT MIND YOU--lost something like 75 Humvees to I.E.D.'s, and that's not counting the ones they kept driving minus, say, front ends that had been blown up.  During one week alone right before coming home, they lost one good man every single day.

        My son is sick of this war and wants to see it end.  And if people like Hitchens spent more time talking to troops on the ground and less time talking to ranking generals who have their own careers to cover, he might get a more accurate picture.  Like one NPR correspondent said after 21 trips to Iraq, "I'm sick and tired of reading press reports from generals in Baghdad saying things are going great, doing better--only to have them go home, retire, and write a book saying things are really terrible but it's not THEIR fault."
        Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.