"History's verdict is all we have left.  And when tomorrow calls today into account, some of us want to say we stood up.  We called out.  We were not silent."
--Leonard Pitts, Jr., "Gestures of Conscience Bring Solace," Baltimore Sun, March 19, 2006

HILLARY SUPPORTERS: FROM ONE MOTHER TO ANOTHER, I'M BEGGING YOU

Print the article

This entry was posted on 6/7/2008 9:10 AM and is filed under uncategorized.

"I don't wanna fly anymore, Doc.  I've flown 35 missions, but Cathcart's raised the number to 50 before you can rotate out."

"I can't ground anyone just because they ask me to."

"Can you ground anyone who's crazy?"

"Of course I can.  There's a rule that says I can ground anyone who's crazy."

"I'M crazy!"

"How do you know?"

"Ask anyone...They all say I'm crazy."

"I tell you who's crazy.  He's crazy.  Anyone has to be crazy to keep flying after all the close calls he's had."

"Why can't you ground HIM?"

"I can, but first he has to ask me."

"That's all he's gotta do to be grounded?"

"That's all."

"Then you can ground him."

"No...There's a catch."

"A catch?"

"Sure.  Catch 22.  Anybody who wants to get out of combat isn't really crazy, so I can't ground him."

"Okay.  Let me see if I've got this straight.  In order to be grounded, I've got to be crazy, and I must be crazy to keep flying, but if I ask to be grounded, it means I'm not crazy anymore and I have to keep flying."

"You got it.  That's Catch 22."

"That's some catch, that Catch 22."

"It's the best there is."
--Catch 22, 1970 movie directed by Mike Nichols, screenplay by Buck Henry, based on the 1961 bestselling novel by Joseph Heller.  In this scene, Alan Arkin's Yossarian is speaking to Jack Gilford's Doc Daneeka.


It was just an exquisite irony that our copy of Time magazine arrived in the mail on the same night that my husband got in the mood to watch the DVD of Catch 22.

On the cover was a Prozac capsule, and half of the capsule was camouflage green.  The headline was, "The Military's Secret Weapon," with the subtitle, "For the first time in history, thousands of U.S. troops are being given antidepressant drugs to deal with battlefield stress.  Is this any way to fight a war?"

The story, by Mark Thompson, can be found online here:

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1811858,00.html

The article is about the terrible toll taken on our military fighting forces under the repeated demands of constant deployments, over and over again, to Iraq and Afghanistan.

How suicides in-country have skyrocketed.

How each successive deployment becomes harder and harder on the emotional health of our troops, how after they get back, they are suffering worse symptoms of post traumatic stress with each deployment. 

How, when they report symptoms--IF they report them--of anxiety, restlessness, depression, irritability and short temper, difficulty sleeping, nightmares, and other problems directly related to combat, the military in all its ancient wisdom responds by prescribing record amounts of anti-depressants, anti-anxiety drugs, and sleeping medications.

How, for the first time in history, soldiers and Marines are heading off to combat situations with up to a third of them taking these medications while deployed.

You see, before, if a troop was showing severe signs of stress on the battlefield, he or she would be medivacced out and given treatment at a hospital.  But the soldiers and Marines are stretched so thin right now that, increasingly, the military is relying on these medications to treat the soldiers, so that they can be kept in combat.

Understand--this is not a criticism of the military or of the troops.

I want to make that perfectly clear.

My family members have served a total of SEVEN tours to Iraq and Afghanistan, and they tell me how much harder it is to go back each successive time.  I can see for myself the problems they have readjusting.

I also do not mean to imply that these fine young men and women are not capable of performing their jobs magnificently under intense pressure--although studies have shown that repeated deployments, extended deployments, and less time at home--do lead to more mistakes being made and the greater likelihood that a troop will be killed or get someone else killed due to the fatigue and stress.

But the fact is that when you are in a combat situation, you do not have access to psychologists or even M.D.'s.  Many times, these drugs are provided for the guys on their deployments but there is nobody to monitor the dose, side effects, or even to provide a modicum of counseling for handling the stress that has provoked the need in the first place.

Our military is doing the best it can, under impossible conditions, to maintain a groaning level of troops without a national draft that could replenish the forces that are constantly demanded by our civilian commander in chief to fight his war the way he wants it fought. 

The troops are exhausted, their families unraveling, and stress symptoms skyrocketing.  They're stretched so thin that even if a troop tries to commit suicide while stateside between deployments, even if he or she is COMMITTED to a psychiatric facility, even if they're being treated for serious PTSD--THEY ARE BEING SENT BACK ANYWAY.

"Boy, it's really nice to have these drugs, so we can keep people deployed."
--remark made by an army doctor to Joyce Raezer of the National Military Family Association, quoted in the article.

In fact, troops who were blown up in a previous deployment and are undergoing physical therapy or surgery for their injuries ARE SENT BACK ANYWAY--sometimes just days following operations.  (A nephew to actress Mia Farrow was recently flown out of Baghdad to undergo surgery, then returned to the battlefield right after being released from the hospital, while still on a liquid diet.  He died in his sleep not long after, in Iraq.)

AND NOW, MY MESSAGE TO HILLARY SUPPORTERS:

According to Wired.com, angry Hillary supporters are starting up websites pledging support to John McCain.  The Republican Party is understandably salivating over this, and planning a ClintonsforMcCain drive.  Just in this past week, thousands have visited these websites.

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/06/angry-clinton-s.html

One website founder was quoted as saying, "People feel upset, and not listened to, and a lot of people feel they are being thrown under the bus."

And so, in their rage, they are planning to vote for John McCain.  Some are so angry they say they won't even vote for Obama if Hillary is on the ticket with him.

I assume that most of the men and women who are signing up on these angry websites are mothers and fathers.

So, from one mother to another, I am begging you.

Since 99.5% of this nation's population is NOT fighting Bush's War, then I must assume that 99.5% of the angry Hillary supporters DO NOT HAVE LOVED ONES FIGHTING in Bush's War either.

And since John McCain has pledged to continue that war for years and years, or until his vague and unspecified "victory" conditions are met, then I assume these same moms and dads, who DO NOT have to face the agony of sending their child away to die or get blown to pieces, not once, but repeatedly...have not actually thought about what that vote would mean.

Did you know that, in order to shield Americans from dead troops, the flag-draped caskets, which are often flown in the cargo holds of commercial airliners from Dover to their homes, are hidden in CARDBOARD BOXES?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/05/books/05maslin.html?ref=books

We treat our pets better in this country.

So I'm assuming that the angry Hillary supporters who feel "upset" and "not listened to" might then be able to EMPATHIZE with desperate military mothers who DO have to deal with these fears, because NOBODY LISTENS TO THE TROOPS--OR THEIR FAMILIES--EITHER.

How do you think THEY feel?

I am an Obama supporter but you better believe I'd have voted for Hillary in a HEARTBEAT over John McCain, I don't care how angry, or upset or vengeful and resentful I felt, because there is a whole helluva lot more at stake here than my hurt feelings, when it comes to men and women being given drugs to numb their anxiety about having to fight a third or fourth time in a war that might send them home in a cardboard box.

In her graceful and eloquent concession speech, Hillary Clinton, while urging her supporters to rally behind Obama, compared the Democratic Party to "a family."

I know that, in my own family, with my sisters and brother, we've had many fights, some bitter, some just annoying, but none of us have EVER done anything that might bring actual harm to another member of our family.  We would never dream of it.

Recently, I hailed a friend of mine at the bank.  Her son did a deployment to Iraq with the army National Guard, and had been home, and back in civilian life for two years now.  Everything was fine, but when I asked how she was doing, she said, "Well, my son is going to have to go back to Iraq this summer."  (The National Guard is being asked to replace returning "surge" units in order to maintain these pre-surge troop levels.)

I was shocked, and sorry, and she said, "I keep telling myself, he's going to be fine.  He's going to come back.  He's going to be fine."

And then she burst into tears.

A vote for John McCain is a vote for insanity.

It is a vote to continue this Groundhog Day Catch-22 war.

I am begging you.

BEGGING YOU.

Please, please do not let the emotion of the moment cause you to hand the reins of power over to a man under whose watch more and more flag-draped caskets will be flown home in cardboard boxes.


"You admit you have a persecution complex."

"I admit I'm being persecuted."

"By whom?"

"By THEM."

"But who, specifically, is THEM?"

"Who do you think?"

"I haven't any idea."

"Then how do you know they AREN'T?  Those bastards are trying to kill me!"

"You ought to get your head examined."
--Catch 22, the movie.  Remarks made by Alan Arkin's Yossarian to Martin Sheen's Dobbs.


I know that Hillary supporters are feeling persecuted.

They think that somebody is trying to kill them--psychically speaking.

But as a military mom, I can tell you that REAL PEOPLE are trying to kill MY FAMILY MEMBERS AND OTHERS in Bush's War. 

According to a recent survey in the Army Times, more than 60% of military families now think the Iraq war was a mistake and want it to end. 

In another survey done of junior officers, well over THREE-FOURTHS of the officers--close to 80%--disagreed with the way the war had been handled.  Most of them do not stay in the military--even though they want to--because they do not want to go back to Iraq.

WHO IS LISTENING TO THEM?

You don't have to like Obama or even do as Hillary asks, which is to put your passion and energy into putting a Democrat into the White House, even if it's not her.  But please, if you can't vote for him, stay home.

Do not put a man in the White House who will continue this insanity of a war.

Because THAT would be truly crazy...wouldn't it?






                                                                               
                                                                                              

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

    • 6/7/2008 7:03 PM hoppycalif wrote:
      We should all thank God we have 5 months to get over our anger over the primary election enough to not vote for McCain. I think it will be very doable to defeat McCain, but my major worry is that he will self destruct before he is the official nominee and the GOP will find someone else they can run who just might be able to be elected.

      Clearly a large chunk of potential GOP voters is very unhappy with McCain as their candidate - because he is too rational for them! That should give us an idea about what kind of candidate they can dig up who will be irrational enough to gather the votes to win.

      And, that is why we all have to accept that we may not have a great Democratic candidate, or even one many of us would prefer, but we still absolutely have to make sure the one we do have is elected in November. The consequences of not doing so are just utterly unacceptable to any sane person.
      Reply to this
      1. 6/8/2008 9:46 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Thank you for your comment.

        I'm not worried that McCain won't make it to the nomination.  The Rep party is in far too disarray to manage ousting their presumptive nominee at this point.  Plus, their own field sucked pretty bad in the early days of the campaign.

        And I do think that, like you say, over five months of watching just what a pandering ill-tempered flip-flopping right-winger-in-maverick-clothes McCain is, most Dems who are angry right now with our party's nominee will realize that they just cannot vote for him, not even in protest, and will (albeit grudgingly) vote for Obama.

        What worries me is, I don't know how many of these Hillary extremists there are out there.  I do know that noisy minorities can dominate news cycles and force their agenda.  The Reps know this too, and will do all they can to sign up on these websites, pretend to be Dem Hillary-supporters, and whip the crowd into a frenzy of aggrieved outrage.

        I would not put it past Rush to egg his people on to do this, just as he egged them on to vote for Hillary in close cross-over primaries because he felt she'd be easier to beat in a general election.  Many thousands did, because a significant number of exit polls found Hillary-voters who claimed, mystifyingly, that they would not vote for her in a general election.  Those people had to be Ditto-heads.

        In other words, I don't know how much real damage they can do, and that worries me a great deal.  I am sorry that they feel cast aside and put upon, but what they feel is NOTHING compared to what these men and women and their families feel who are having to fight this Groundhog Day war over and over again.

        They feel completely forgotten, and they ARE.

        We just cannot put someone in the WH who will keep sending these exhausted troops into the maw.  Enough is enough.

        I just don't want people to lose sight of that.
        Reply to this
    • 6/8/2008 12:07 PM Barry C aka Casey wrote:
      Again you have spoke up for the soldiers and their families. Keep it up. We must make it clear that war is not healthy. The mind doesn't want to do what we ask our soldiers to do. So if we are going to put them through this awful experience then we have to take care not to permanently damage them mentally and physically. I have often said that the child abuse I and others experienced at the hands of our fathers was directly linked to their service in WWII. Remember these guys whether voluntary or enlisted were in for the duration. My mother did not see her fiancé for over four years as she waited for him to return from the South Pacific.
      Reply to this
      1. 6/9/2008 9:01 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        I think you're right--my husband had an uncle who literally cracked up and spent most of his life off and on in mental institutions.  He wonders, too, if the war was the underlying cause.  I also believe that much of the alcoholism and other problems from the WWII vets is also, ultimately, about the war.
        Reply to this
        1. 6/11/2008 5:37 PM hoppycalif wrote:
          This is why we, as a country, should never consider military action as a legitimate part of diplomacy. And, since a threat that is empty does more harm than no threat at all, we can't afford to have our president threatening to attack any country. Military action must be reserved for legitimate defense of our country, and to a lesser extent, the defense of our allies.

          Unfortunately, we have a bloated "defense" industry, which relies on continual war and threats of war for their profits. That industry and the military top officers who want jobs in that industry on retirement from the military, are perhaps the biggest threat we have to peace.

          My hope is that Obama will prove to be the first president since Eisenhower to understand the seriousness of this problem and act accordingly. I feel I owe it to my 4 grandchildren to do whatever I can to bring this about.
          Reply to this
          1. 6/11/2008 6:44 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
            I could not have said it better, my friend.
            Reply to this
    • 6/12/2008 12:22 PM LaKeisha Chestnut wrote:
      Thank you. I have a friend who is currently serving a 15 month tour over in Iraq. She has a 4 year old daughter. So I totally agree with your post.

      Deanie,
      I would like to interview you for my blog. Is that ok with you? I would love to talk to you about this on my blog. Thanks!!

      LaKeisha Chestnut
      Reply to this
      1. 6/12/2008 1:04 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        I'd be honored to be interviewed by you, LaKeisha.  Do I need to send you my e-mail?
        Reply to this
        1. 6/12/2008 1:14 PM LaKeisha Chestnut wrote:
          Here's my email..
          chellidee@hotmail.com

          I am going to Florida as an Obama Organizing Fellow to help unify the party..So I will be posting a lot..
          Reply to this
    Leave a comment

     Enter the above security code (required)

     Name

     Email (will not be published)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.