"History's verdict is all we have left.  And when tomorrow calls today into account, some of us want to say we stood up.  We called out.  We were not silent."
--Leonard Pitts, Jr., "Gestures of Conscience Bring Solace," Baltimore Sun, March 19, 2006

THE PURPLING OF THE LONE STAR STATE

Print the article

This entry was posted on 10/20/2008 9:04 AM and is filed under uncategorized.

(This is just up at HuffingtonPost.com, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deanie-mills/changing-colors-in-the-lo_b_136190.html, under the title, "Changing Colors in the Lone Star State, and cross-posted at TPM Cafe:  http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/deanie_mills/2008/10/the-purpling-of-the-lone-star.php 



On just about any political polling map you can name, the state of Texas is always reliably Red.  A former Texas governor is now the president (such as he is); we've got a Republican governor, both our U.S. senators are Republican, and Tom DeLay's famous and evil redistricting scheme,   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/01/AR2005120101927_pf.html

which caused all the state Democratic congressmen to literally leave the state and hide out in New Mexico to avoid voting for it--gave the U.S. Congress five more Republicans in the following election. 

But those maps don't tell the whole story.  The truth is that Texas is turning more purple every day.

Weekend endorsements from the Dallas Morning News,

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/editorials/stories/DN-nutwospots_19edi.State.Edition1.2908f55.html

which backed John McCain, and the Houston Chronicle
 

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/recommendations/6065490.html

and Austin American Statesman,

http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/stories/10/19/1019president_edit.html

which endorsed Barack Obama, are perfect examples of the split personality of the state of Texas at this time, and the changing nature of that personality.

And a dead-on example of that is Dallas county.  Once a bastion of conservatism, it would appear on the surface to still be one, since, after all, the Morning News endorsed McCain, revealing their bias in this telling statement:


"Americans approach this election in understandable fear and anger, especially at the incumbent Republican president who, however unjustly, bears the brunt of the blame for the crisis. "  (emphasis mine)


This is the kind of little editorial caveat, buried in the middle of a sentence, that reveals a great deal.  Somehow, the man who has been president for the past eight years is NOT TO BLAME for the wreckage he has made not only of his own presidency, but of the nation.

The editorial goes on to point out all the times McCain bucked his own party--not mentioning, of course, that he has reversed himself on all those things, and to dwell for an entire paragraph on the deficit, which bothers the paper, apparently, more than any other problem facing the country.  (Ranking economists on both sides of the political aisle agree that the deficit is actually the LEAST of our problems right now.)

But what the editorial says is meaningless in the face of the REALITY of what is going on in Dallas country right now.

In 2006, EVERY SINGLE DALLAS COUNTY ELECTION SPOT WAS WON BY DEMOCRATS, from judges to dogcatcher.

In fact, as former Democratic gubanatorial candidate Chris Bell wrote on the website, The Texas Blue  http://www.thetexasblue.com

there is growing excitement among Texas Democrats statewide:

http://www.thetexasblue.com/democratic-outlook


"People in Texas woke up after the 2006 election and realized a new day had dawned. Gone was the skepticism and despair which had driven us to our lowest point. People all across the state were ready to fight another day.

"Nowhere has the awakening been any greater than here at home in Harris County. Shortly after the 2006 election, after seeing the successful effort in Dallas County, a committee was formed to try to recruit judicial candidates since that had been so difficult in the past. There was no need for a recruitment committee. People were lining up to run for judge in Harris County and now there will be contested Democratic Primary races for a large number of benches. We also have great candidates for every other county office.

"The Harris County Democratic Party’s Johnson Rayburn Dinner had attracted 300 or so people in 2006. In 2007, over 800 people purchased tickets and the ballroom was packed to the gills. "


Bell goes on to describe numerous Democratic events he has attended statewide, with hundreds more in attendance than expected, and mentions that even the media "no longer treats the Republican party as invincible."

Harris county is, of course home to Houston, and this new blue flame is licking at a city's heels that once seemed the impregnable fortress of Bush Oilfield Republican Rule, and is still the home of George Bush 41. 

According to Texas Blue,  http://www.thetexasblue.com/races-could-surprise-you-tx-u-s-district-10 the 10th District, which encompasses a large area from the southwest suburbs of Austin to the northwest suburbs of Houston, has also benefitted from an influx of Democratic voters, putting its congressional seat into play.

The thing is, for the stalwart Houston Chronicle to endorse Barack Obama is big.  Huge.  Massive.  Ginormous.  (Okay, I'll stop now.):


"The incoming administration must immediately focus and engage on so many fronts. The tasks at hand will require stamina, creativity and leadership abilities to replace partisan gridlock with a national consensus on what is best for the American people. The new leadership team must have the intellect and temperament to tackle complex issues with equally sophisticated solutions. The current go-it-alone mentality in the White House on foreign policy must give way to an effort to work in concert with our allies while engaging our enemies at the negotiating table as well as on the battlefield.

"After carefully observing the Democratic and Republican nominees in drawn-out primary struggles as well as in the general campaign, including three debates, the Chronicle strongly believes that the ticket of Sens. Barack Obama and Joe Biden offers the best choice to lead the United States on a new course into the second decade of the 21st century.

"Obama appears to possess the tools to confront our myriad and daunting problems. He's thoughtful and analytical. He has met his opponents' attacks with calm and reasoned responses. Viewers of the debates saw a poised, well-prepared plausible president with well-articulated positions on the bread-and-butter issues that poll after poll indicate are the true concerns of voters. While Arizona Sen. John McCain and his running mate Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin have struck an increasingly personal and negative tone in their speeches, Obama has continued to talk about issues of substance."


They go on to say that while they hope Obama might be more amenable to the oil industry than he's been so far, they applaud his support of NASA.  Like most of 104 other nationwide newspapers who have endorsed Obama,
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/why-obamas-shocking-lands_b_136010.html

the Chronicle deplores McCain's campaign tactics and his choice of Sarah Palin as VP.

For the Austin American Statesman to endorse Obama is not quite so cataclysmic, since the state capitol and home to the University of Texas is known as a liberal town.  However, the capitol itself has been pretty reliably Red in recent years, which makes the American Statesman's comments that much more satisfying:


"In the third and final debate last week, John McCain, the Republican senator from Arizona, tried to bait him into the gutter, but Obama refused to get down there. Political wisdom dictates that candidates who are attacked return double the fire directed at them. Obama responded calmly, defending himself but declining to respond in kind.

"Now that's change."
 

They go on to play the "now that's change" meme all through the piece.  I hope Tom DeLay's boys choked on it over their Cheerios Sunday morning, before leaving for church, where they could pretend to be righteous.

But it's not just the big cities of Texas that are turning purple. 

A look at the congressional map put up by the Lone Star Project,

http://www.lonestarproject.net/Map/House%20Protect/TXVictoryMap.html
 

shows a bright swath of blue right through the heart of West Texas--what I like to call the buckle of the Bush Bible Belt.  The blue sections encompass areas in the vicinity of Midland--the town where Bush likes to pretend he grew up--the ultra-conservative Abilene, and the Panhandle town of Plainview, as well as deep East Piney Woods counties, (that puts the lie to the idea of total Redneck dominance).

As the accompanying article points out, http://www.lonestarproject.net/Map/TXVictory.html 

this has come about IN SPITE OF DeLay's redistricting sheme.  And we all know by now, much to my happy relish, DeLay himself lost his own seat in 2006 to a Democrat, Nick Lampson.

As Chris Bell pointed out in his piece, the purpling--even possible blueing--of the Lone Star State is not going to happen all at once, even with a Democratic lead candidate as charismatic and competent as the one we've got.  It's happening, in fact, so gradually that the Republicans don't even seem to have noticed.  This is still a state where neither top candidate ever visits during the final weeks of their campaigns, because they assume the state is too reliably Red for either one to worry about.

But this year, Obama is running ads in Texas around the clock.  I see them all the time, and we get our local news feed from Abilene.  His Texas organization is well-trained, well-funded, and well-organized.  They're fighting for every single vote.

Over time, those votes are going to add up.  Check in with me again in four years.  By that time I think Texas is going to be purple.

By the end of President Obama's second term, it might even be blue.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 10/20/2008 11:12 PM Tom Shepard, Houston wrote:
      The shift may happen a little sooner than you'd think.

      Gerrymandering has a curious limitation: while it can be used to keep a minority party in power, the closer it's shaved, the more likely a complete and catastrophic loss of power becomes.

      Say you've got a state with 4.9 million voters, divided into 7 districts of 700,000 each. It's been extreme-gerrymandered so that 4 districts are majority R, with 350,001 R's and 349,999 D's; 3 districts are majority D, with 700,000 D's and no R's.

      There are a total of 1,400,004 R's in the state - only 29% of the total. But the R's control 4 of 7 districts - enough to control ALL the electoral votes.

      Q: What happens if only 1 R voter in each of the R districts changes her mind?
      A: ALL 7 DISTRICTS go D, not only changing the electoral vote of the state, but also changing 4 of the 7 Representatives from R to D.

      The greater the number of districts in a state, the closer you can shave the gerrymandering to the point where barely 25% of the voters are controlling the entire electoral vote. But you do so at the risk of losing ALL the districts in a catastrophic loss caused by just a very few voters changing their minds.

      On a smaller scale, this is exactly what happened to Tom Delay in District 22: in order to maximize the number of districts controlled by Republicans, several formerly Republican-safe districts had to give up a few Republican voters so that adjacent districts could become majority-Republican.

      Gerrymandering is the Ring of Power, the use of which eventually becomes one's own downfall. I can only hope that we D's maintain our majority through wise governance rather than electoral manipulation - or the same catastrophic loss of power awaits us.

      After this election, let's keep on 'em to keep 'em honest.

      Stay on it, Deanie!!
      Reply to this
      1. 10/21/2008 8:46 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        What an outstanding analyis, and thank you for posting this.  I didn't really realize all that.  I do know that here in West Texas, DeLay's tactics cost us a beloved congressman of over 20 years, Charlie Stenholm, who would have been chairman of the Agriculture committee two years later when the Dems won congress.  Stenholm was the original Blue Dog; more conservative than me but still a very good congressman.  His spot went to a total moron, thanks to Tom DeLay, and half the time I don't even know who's running in our pretzle-district.

        Come back and see us!  You obviously know way more than me ha ha!  You can keep me honest!
        Reply to this
        1. 10/21/2008 10:05 AM Tom Shepard wrote:
          Oh STOP IT! Anyone who can organize a book on forensic pathology clearly has the capacity to follow tech stuff. And anyway, the "aw shucks" attitude makes you sound like Sarah Palin!

          I've cross-posted to TPMCafe and HuffPost. You've talked about editors asking, "Is this paragraph necessary?" Dang, 250 words is a TOUGH bar to get under! And the robo-editor is immune to my pleading. Still, if the tighter post helps a few people get past my natural nerd-wordiness (hey, EVERY detail is CRITICAL!), that's a few I wouldn't have reached before.
          Reply to this
          1. 10/21/2008 11:11 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
            BITE YOUR TONGUE!!!  Sarah PALIN????

            I like to think I'm waay more along the lines of Tina Fey.  ;-D

            I'm lousy at cutting blog-lengths; really lousy.  I tend to write magazine-article stuff rather than simply mouthing off, tho I'm more than capable of mouthing as well.

            You must be referring to that HuffPo feature that limits character-lengths on comments.  Like one of my heroes, Craig Ferguson says, I KNOOOOOW!  I too have felt their cold axe and been forced to be concise, DAMMIT!
            Reply to this
    • 10/30/2008 7:04 PM wendi aarons wrote:
      Hi, Deanie. I just read your HuffPost piece & was happy to see you're a fellow Austinite. Great writing, great thoughts. I've remembered so many times over the past year Molly saying something about why aren't we out in the streets banging on pots and pans? Anyway, nice to have found you!
      Reply to this
      1. 10/31/2008 7:48 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        I'd love to claim Austin as home, but I live out here in the buckle of the Bush Bible belt.

        I'm familiar with the pots and pans reference.  She was talking about ending the war.  I've been banging those pans with all my might to do my part to end that travesty, especially since my son and nephews did six combat deployments there, between them.
        Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.