"History's verdict is all we have left.  And when tomorrow calls today into account, some of us want to say we stood up.  We called out.  We were not silent."
--Leonard Pitts, Jr., "Gestures of Conscience Bring Solace," Baltimore Sun, March 19, 2006

THEY'RE NOT ALL CRAZY, BUT THEY ARE DIFFERENT

Print the article

This entry was posted on 11/8/2009 4:37 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

In her thoughtful and literary op-ed for the New York Times, "Back from War, but Not Really Home," Caroline Alexander quotes an epic poem thousands of years old that perfectly captures how it feels, even today, for the man or woman, home from war:

WASHED onto the shores of his island home, after 10 years’ absence in a foreign war and 10 years of hard travel in foreign lands, Odysseus, literature’s most famous veteran, stares around him: “But now brilliant Odysseus awoke from sleep in his own fatherland, and he did not know it,/having been long away.” Additionally, the goddess Athena has cast an obscuring mist over all the familiar landmarks, making “everything look otherwise/than it was.” “Ah me,” groans Odysseus, “what are the people whose land I have come to this time?”

But if epic poetry is not your thing, then perhaps the words of the unsinkable Max Cleland, who lost half his body to a grenade in Vietnam, can sum it up better, in his op-ed, "The Forever War of the Mind":

“EVERY day I was in Vietnam, I thought about home. And, every day I’ve been home, I’ve thought about Vietnam.” So said one of the millions of soldiers who fought there as I did. Change the name of the battlefield and it could have been said by one of the American servicemen coming home from Iraq or Afghanistan today. Wars are not over when the shooting stops. They live on in the lives of those who fight them. That is the curse of the soldier. He never forgets.

It is the sad lot of the war veteran, male or female, soldier, Marine, airman or sailor, no matter what the war, that people back home (other than friends and family) seldom give them a thought unless something horrific happens like the Fort Hood shooting of the other day.  Or a patriotic holiday.  Or maybe, a movie like Rambo.

Usually, though, returning vets are slotting into the "crazy" section of people's minds when something like this happens and the media lights up like a Christmas tree with all the stories about post traumatic stress syndrome.  And then the movies and TV shows get made of returning vets flipping out and taking hostages or shooting up a bank or turning serial killer.

This used to particularly bother my husband during the Rambo craze.  It seemed to him that in just about every action-adventure movie we went to see, the crazy criminal was a Vietnam vet gone nuts.  Now we're starting to see it updated, with Iraq or Afghanistan vets portrayed as the crazy war vet.

Now, do not misunderstand.  I do not for one moment make light of the serious problems faced by our men and women who have served in these endless wars, and statistics are bearing out that it as the multiple deployments that are increasing the rates of PTSD exponentially.  For each deployment, the chances go up.

So, the stats that say that 35% of troops who have served in these wars will at one time or another be diagnosed with PTSD are very true, and that is only those who have been diagnosed; there are many more who either have not received a formal diagnosis or who have not sought out serious help for their symptoms.

And it is true that signs of stress on our armed forces are straining the military beyond belief: rising suicide rates, family violence, divorce--even things that have only recently been measured, such as post-deployment motorcycle accidents that have resulted in fatalities, and things like barroom fights.  These are all serious signs of severe stress resulting from these constant and ongoing deployments.

Because what most civilians do not understand is that, even when they are not deployed, they are TRAINING for the next deployment, which means that they are still away from their families for long periods of time and they are still in simulated war games which can exacerbate combat stress, as well as family stress when they return from training exercises.

I am very aware of all of this.  So don't get me wrong.

But what I am trying to say is that so many of these men and women--thousands upon thousands of them--are managing.  Quite well, in fact.

They complete their tours of duty; they get out of the service; they return to school and/or find jobs; they marry, start families.  They join their communities.  They thrive.

The war is always with them, okay?  It just is.  That is their reality, and it is always going to be their reality.

Sometimes they have sleepless nights.  Nightmares.  Headaches.  Irritability.  Short tempers.  They struggle with that sometimes.  Maybe they apologize to their spouses a bit more often than you or me.

If they are fortunate, they'll have a spouse who understands and will be patient with them while they work through it.  If not, well, sometimes the marriage itself doesn't work out, but then, often, the next one will.

Maybe they spend a bit more time off to themselves than we do.  Maybe, in a group of people, they are kind of quiet.  Maybe they don't often talk about what is on their minds, and maybe there is a good reason for that.

Writes Alexander:

But it is “The Odyssey” that most directly probes the theme of the war veteran’s return. Threaded through this fairytale saga, amid its historic touchstones, are remarkable scenes addressing aspects of the war veteran’s experience that are disconcertingly familiar to our own age. Odysseus returns home to a place he does not recognize, and then finds his homestead overrun with young men who have no experience of war. Throughout his long voyage back, he has reacted to each stranger with elaborate caginess, concocting stories about who he is and what he has seen and done — the real war he keeps to himself.

...

Similarly, while Odysseus is lost at sea, his son, Telemachus, embarks on a voyage of discovery, also seeking out his father’s former comrades, but those who lived to return. First of these is old Nestor, a veteran of many campaigns, now at home in sandy Pylos. No mortal man could “tell the whole of it,” says Nestor of the years at Troy, where “all who were our best were killed.” In Sparta, Menelaus, whose wife, Helen, was the cause of the war, is haunted by the losses: “I wish I lived in my house with only a third part of all/these goods, and that the men were alive who died in those days/in wide Troy land.”

Men and women who have fought in a bloody war do not usually go around brooding on those things day and night but little things can remind them or set them off, as can anniversary dates, and they usually try to keep their moods to themselves to avoid upsetting those close to them.

My son, for example, will go for a long run rather than take it out on his girlfriend.

Sometimes it is just the heedlessness of those around them that is distressing. 

I'll never forget when I visited the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, D.C.  I began to sob as soon as I saw the names at the bottom level, and the further I walked toward the center of the monument the harder I wept until I stood, utterly and completely surrounded--not by names--but by what I saw as the faces of boys I'd known, boys I'd kissed good-night on my doorstep and sent Care packages to and mailed letters to, and I couldn't stop crying...while all around me, insensitive tourists too young to have known that war laughed, jostled, and posed for snapshots in front of the Wall.

These are the things that upset veterans.

Writes Max Cleland:

War is haunting. Death. Pain. Blood. Dismemberment. A buddy dying in your arms. Imagine trying to get over the memory of a bomb splitting a Humvee apart beneath your feet and taking your leg with it. The first time I saw the stilled bodies of American soldiers dead on the battlefield is as stark and brutal a memory as the one of the grenade that ripped off my right arm and both legs.

No, the soldier never forgets. But neither should the rest of us.

Veterans returning today represent the first real influx of combat-wounded soldiers in a generation. They are returning to a nation unprepared for what war does to the soul. Those new veterans will need all of our help. After America’s wars, the used-up fighters are too often left to fend for themselves.

One thing Caroline Alexander points out is that, even in the ancient times, nations seem more comfortable honoring the war DEAD than they do the war SURVIVOR: 

In “The Iliad,” Achilles must choose between kleos or nostos — glory or a safe return home. By dying at Troy, Achilles was assured of undying fame as the greatest of all heroes. His choice reflects an uneasy awareness that it is far easier to honor the dead soldier than the soldier who returns.

You would think, as Alexander points out, that one way to honor the modern war veterans would be heroic war movies, which have been made since the Iraq and Afghanistan wars began.

And yet box office receipts tell a different story.  No one seems to want to pay money to watch them. 

What does THAT tell returning war vets?  We still read about Troy but YOUR stories don't matter?

There has been a strange disconnect from the beginning between these wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the American public back home.  President Bush, who started both wars, asked nothing in return from the American people--no war-tax to help pay for them, no sacrifice of any kind.  He deliberately hid the war-dead from them, and when the public began to turn against the war, the Pentagon instituted a strict policy preventing war photographers from depicting photographs of wounded soldiers or Marines without the express written consent of those troops who, of course, were in no position to provide it, which sanitized the war even further.

And of course, there was no draft, so the same 1% of the population just kept fighting the same wars over and over again while everybody else went shopping.

At some point the war began to seem more like a video game or a movie or even a patriotic country-music song to be forwarded in e-mails to friends and family; somehow it just didn't seem real.

As Cleland points out in his piece, when it comes to funding wars, Congress has no problem coming up with billions and billions for all the Humvees and Predator drones and tanks and guns they need.

But when the soldiers and Marines who have been fighting those wars come home broken and wounded, suddenly, the dollars dry up.

We'd been at war for FIVE YEARS before the deplorable conditions at Walter Reed came to light.  Five years.

Cleland writes:

Weeks before the troubles at Walter Reed became public in 2007, my counselor put it to me simply. “We are drowning in war,” she said. The problems at Walter Reed had nothing to do with the dedicated doctors and nurses there. The problems had to do with the White House and Congress and the Department of Defense. The problems had to do with money.

When we are at war, America spends billions on missiles, tanks, attack helicopters and such. But the wounded warriors who will never fight again tend to be put on the back burner.

This is inexcusable, and it comes with frightening moral costs.

He goes on to detail the obvious, and then he points out something not so obvious:

We have a family Army today, unlike the Army seen in any generation before. We have fought these wars with the Reserves and the National Guard. Fathers, mothers, soccer coaches and teachers are the soldiers coming home. Whether they like it or not, they will bring their war experiences home to their families and communities.

In his poem “The Dead Young Soldiers,” Archibald MacLeish, whose younger brother died in World War I, has the soldiers in the poem tell us:“We leave you our deaths. Give them their meaning.” Until we help our returning soldiers get their lives back when they come home, the promise of restoring that meaning will go unfulfilled. 

So...you're sitting here reading this (still, I hope), and you're thinking, well, geez, what can I do?  I mean, I care and all, but I dunno...

Maybe you meet a vet or a soldier at an airport and you shake his or her hand and say, "Thank you for your service."

That's nice.  They appreciate that.

But here are some other ideas.

Once, when my son was on his last "free" night before deploying to Iraq with the Marines, he went out for a meal of sushi at his favorite place in San Diego.  Now, admittedly, that's obviously a military town, Camp Pendleton is right there, and although he was in civilian clothes he had that military bearing that is unmistakeable, and the haircut...

He got up to pay his bill, and the guy said, "Sir, your bill has been taken care of, by the couple at the end of the bar."

Dustin was so surprised, and he went to thank them, and they said simply, "Son, thank you for your service."

Now, I doubt many of you will have similar opportunities, but maybe you know a couple who might be struggling, and one of them recently served.  Do you think they could use a night on the town but are having trouble affording a babysitter?  How about you volunteer a night for free?

Or, say you get a coupon for a free meal at Olive Garden or whatever, you give it to a vet and say, Hey, I hate Olive Garden?  (Maybe you don't really, but you get my drift.)

If you're in a position to offer them a job, by all means do so--you won't regret it.  Or if you know how, help them beef up their resume and transfer their military skills to the civilian world.

Be creative.  There are a million ways you can quietly show your support for a man or a woman who are doing their best to adjust to civilian life after they have served.  You can let them know that you appreciate them just by being their friend.

That's it, really.

Just be their friend.  It doesn't matter whether you supported the war or you opposed the war.  It doesn't matter who you voted for.  This is a man or woman who stepped up, did their duty, and now, they're doing their best to adjust and fit in to a place where, let's face it, they are always going to feel different.

They just are.

Just by welcoming them, letting them know you appreciate their service and that you're there to help them move on, that can make all the difference in the world as to how well they are able to make that difficult adjustment.

In this way, you can help them give meaning to their service.  Because what you may not realize is that, each day that they are alive, they are living for their buddies who did not make it, and they want to make that life worth something, they want to make that life the best they can possibly make it.

They want to live a life their buddy would have been proud to live, if they'd only had the chance.

You can help them with that, quietly, without much fuss.

It's not Odysseus, but hey, it's a start. 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 11/9/2009 9:45 AM Nigel wrote:
      >>>If they are fortunate, they'll have a spouse who understands and will be patient with them while they work through it.<<<

      Eileen's got the printed "T" shirt for this, although it was Police related 20 years after I left the Army.

      >>>nations seem more comfortable honoring the war DEAD than they do the war SURVIVOR: <<<

      I think part of this is that many of the survivors feel they've done something wrong by getting back when their mates didn't.

      Over a century ago Kipling wrote:-

      When the 'arf-made recruity goes out to the East
      'E acts like a babe an' 'e drinks like a beast,
      An' 'e wonders because 'e is frequent deceased
      Ere 'e's fit for to serve as a soldier.
      Serve, serve, serve as a soldier,
      Serve, serve, serve as a soldier,
      Serve, serve, serve as a soldier,
      So-oldier OF the Queen!

      Now all you recruities what's drafted to-day,
      You shut up your rag-box an' 'ark to my lay,
      An' I'll sing you a soldier as far as I may:
      A soldier what's fit for a soldier.
      Fit, fit, fit for a soldier . . .

      First mind you steer clear o' the grog-sellers' huts,
      For they sell you Fixed Bay'nets that rots out your guts --
      Ay, drink that 'ud eat the live steel from your butts --
      An' it's bad for the young British soldier.
      Bad, bad, bad for the soldier . . .

      When the cholera comes -- as it will past a doubt --
      Keep out of the wet and don't go on the shout,
      For the sickness gets in as the liquor dies out,
      An' it crumples the young British soldier.
      Crum-, crum-, crumples the soldier . . .

      But the worst o' your foes is the sun over'ead:
      You must wear your 'elmet for all that is said:
      If 'e finds you uncovered 'e'll knock you down dead,
      An' you'll die like a fool of a soldier.
      Fool, fool, fool of a soldier . . .

      If you're cast for fatigue by a sergeant unkind,
      Don't grouse like a woman nor crack on nor blind;
      Be handy and civil, and then you will find
      That it's beer for the young British soldier.
      Beer, beer, beer for the soldier . . .

      Now, if you must marry, take care she is old --
      A troop-sergeant's widow's the nicest I'm told,
      For beauty won't help if your rations is cold,
      Nor love ain't enough for a soldier.
      'Nough, 'nough, 'nough for a soldier . . .

      If the wife should go wrong with a comrade, be loath
      To shoot when you catch 'em -- you'll swing, on my oath! --
      Make 'im take 'er and keep 'er: that's Hell for them both,
      An' you're shut o' the curse of a soldier.
      Curse, curse, curse of a soldier . . .

      When first under fire an' you're wishful to duck,
      Don't look nor take 'eed at the man that is struck,
      Be thankful you're livin', and trust to your luck
      And march to your front like a soldier.
      Front, front, front like a soldier . . .

      When 'arf of your bullets fly wide in the ditch,
      Don't call your Martini a cross-eyed old bitch;
      She's human as you are -- you treat her as sich,
      Reply to this
      1. 11/9/2009 10:11 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Funny how timeless war songs and poems remain over the centuries, eh?
        Reply to this
    • 11/11/2009 1:33 PM Nigel wrote:
      War has the same sort of effects on everybody who engages in it. Therefore I expect the writing and poems to have similar themes.

      School stopped for two minutes at 11:00 this morning.
      Reply to this
      1. 11/11/2009 4:04 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Thank you for reminding us that peace came after World War I on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month in 1918, wasn't it?  I could Google it to be sure but I've got so many things minimized as we speak that my computer has slowed to a snail's pace and I'm loathe to take the time to check it out.  I believe that's correct.  Called Armistice Day over here originally; we call it Veteran's Day now, and have a National holiday to honor the veteran's of all our wars, which, sadly never seem to end, do they?
        Reply to this
      2. 11/13/2009 1:37 PM Nigel wrote:
        >>>Called Armistice Day over here originally; we call it Veteran's Day now, and have a National holiday to honor the veteran's of all our wars, which, sadly never seem to end, do they?<<<

        It is called "Remembrance Day" here and we do or get a day off to honour our dead or veterans. Our forces do not get issued the best kit, and our injured are not looked after as well as they should be. This government even tried to get payments to some reduced. Bastards. I can not see wars ending any time soon. It is an unfortunate fact that quite a lot of good science results from the "bad science" involved in making better weapons and other military kit.
        Reply to this
    • 3/31/2010 12:39 PM Ken wrote:
      Hey Deanie,

      TANSTAAFL. Once again we will have to agree to disagree. Because Obamacare is a bloated economic disaster, passed in the dead of night, with no real debate, full of back room deals, and as Nancy said, "we'll have to pass it to see what's in it." What ever happened to "put it all on CSPAN so we can see who gets what?" Or "put it on the web for five days before I sign it?"

      And the problem with legislation when passed with no real debate is the law of unintended consequences. The first of these are just beginning to trickle out now - more massive costs. Come on, does anyone really believe that the federal government can take over 1/6 of the economy and its going to cost less than private business doing the same thing? Where has that ever happened? Hmmm, let's see. The Post Office? Amtrack? Fannie May? Freddie Mac? Social Security (didn't we just go in the red this year)? Medicaid? Medicare? Well, maybe not.

      So the feds take over the student loan program and add it in to make Obamacare look deposit neutral? 500 billion cut from Medicare? The doctor fix not included, because we know that cost would break the bank? (Now what is health care, student loans or payments to doctors?) So now we have massive write offs by major companies because the government no longer gives them a tax credit for payments for their retirees drug benefits. (I wonder who that is going to hurt - retirees maybe?) All kinds of things that could have been fixed if this were passed with open, honest debate - so we could all look at what went into this mess. Or taken one step at a time to fix all the things that we agree are wrong with the health care system. Why was this necessary?

      But the bottom line is, don't you find something fundamentally wrong with the idea that the federal government can make you buy something from a private company just for living in America and breathing? (We're not talking here "get a license to drive a car on public roads.") Pray tell, where is that in the Constitution and does it end? The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen. The people that I know oppose Obamacare on principle - personal choice and individual freedom, not government choice and welfare. And it doesn't matter to them if they receive a benefit from the program or not. Contrary to popular belief, we are not stupid people. Look at the people you see in Tea Party crowds - many people who never demonstrated before in their lives - the greatest generation. It may be that we are demographically changing and that we will turn into a welfare state because of it. We may have reached the tipping point now, where more people vote to get a benefit than pay into the system to pay all those benefits. The me generation. I hope not, but we may well have reached that point. What ever happened to, "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country?"

      Your favorite former democrat...
      Reply to this
      1. 4/1/2010 11:20 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        (Sorry, but I don't know what TANSTAAFL means)  As for the rest of your comment, it sounds like you strung together all the FOX news talking points you could think of without really bothering to think it through.  Actually, the bill was debated EXTENSIVELY for months and months--my God, when it was in Baucas's finance committee for months on end and we actually thought we could get Susan Collins or another  moderate Republican, they argued the finer points for weeks on end, and Dems gave up all kinds of sacred cows that liberals loved in order to win over conservative Dems like Ben Nelson and moderate Reps like Collins.

        The bill WAS put up on the Internet for 72 hours before it was signed--it was one of the reasons that Obama postponed his trip for several months.

        And the government has NOT "taken over one-sixth of the economy"--in fact, the day AFTER the bill was signed, the stock market went up 60 points, driven in large part by stocks in what? Insurance companies, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and health care related industries.  WHY?  Because it's a HUGE boon to their economies, that's why!  The insurance companies will get 32 million more customers--how can THAT be a "government takeover"?  The pharmaceutical companies, in exchange for their support for the bill, managed to get Dems to throw out the sensible provision that would force them to negotiate for cheaper prices, as the VA does, so they'll be enriched beyond their wildest dreams.

        In fact, this bill is so far BEYOND AND NOT socialism that it makes me laugh.

        As far as that student loan program you're so proud of, in the last year of Bush's presidency, that program was RIDDLED with corruption, graft, and bribery--it was a massive scandal and cost the government BILLIONS--a little fact that the right seems to conveniently forget when it suits their purposes.  I, however, remember it vividly because my kids owe quite a bit in student loans and I've followed the program closely in a number of publications OTHER than FOX news.

        As far as personal choice goes, we chose to keep our employer-based policy, and that will not change.  Our daughter, however, who has not had health insurance in her entire adult life because she could not possibly afford it making what she does as an actor, will FINALLY have access to some decent plans, which will be affordable to her because she will have access to a large pool from which to choose and will qualify for subsidies.  AND she will not be penalized for the fact that she was sick three years ago, a fact that could have kept her from being insured for the rest of her life.


        Reply to this
    • 4/2/2010 4:11 AM Nigel wrote:
      >>>I don't know what TANSTAAFL means<<<

      There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.

      School's closed for the Easter holidays (vacation to you) and I went out for a let lunch yesterday. Cost me $26ish for a bottle of wine, some olives and soda water for a friend while we were waiting for the main group to arrive. Then I had garlic bread starter, pizza main course and glass of house red for $15ish.

      As we say over here "Yer pays yer money and makes yer choice." I think health care free at source is a good idea, even though it costs me a lot more than people less well off, in taxes etc. Our system is far from perfect but everybody who needs it gets treated. Dental care is a bit different. Because of how our government cocked up the way dentists are paid, many of them opted out of the National health Service. Mine included. It costs me a bit more for treatment but I can now get an appointment when I want one. Trying to see my doctor is a different matter though. I've had a breathing problem and could not make an appointment for over three weeks. I got in to see a different one in the same surgery after having a phone interview with a triage nurse. The appointemnt was for two days after the phone conversation. I was prescribed a Ventolin inhaler and because I paid some $160 for an annual pre payment, I got the inhaler for nothing. I take two tablets (different medication) per day for high blood ressure and one for high cholesterol. That makes my prepayment certificate well worth the money. As I said in another thread, as of 8 May, I will get all my drugs free because I hit sixty that day.
      Reply to this
      1. 4/3/2010 9:10 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Your input is always fun to me  because you are British and over here, the right-wingers demonized that system so much without really knowing all that much about it.  But it seems to me to be fairly workable, in that you can opt to PAY at least some, and then you get better services if that is your choice, or, you get it completely free but do have a wait.  Either way, it seems to me that what you do pay is fairly modest compared to what we pay over here just for private premiums, which are absolutely astronomical, and even then, they know full well that it is not at all unusual to wait three months for an appt with, say, a rheumatologist or orthopedist or cardiologist. If you have to cancel that appt, you may be charged for it anyway, and get back at the back of the line and wait three more months, and that's WITH deductables and co-pay, plus the premiums.  For private care, NOT "government run."

        So much hypocrisy over here, in this discussion.
        Reply to this
    • 4/5/2010 3:26 AM Nigel wrote:
      >>>rheumatologist or orthopedist or cardiologist<<<

      Over 'ere, we just 'ave doctors.
      Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.