"History's verdict is all we have left.  And when tomorrow calls today into account, some of us want to say we stood up.  We called out.  We were not silent."
--Leonard Pitts, Jr., "Gestures of Conscience Bring Solace," Baltimore Sun, March 19, 2006

OBAMA GETS HIS MOJO BACK

Print the article

This entry was posted on 9/25/2011 5:41 PM and is filed under uncategorized.

Before I say a word, I want you to take three minutes out of your life and watch this clip, because it shows more eloquently than I could ever say, the truth for anyone who doubts this president is on fire.

Now, in case some of you are just too damned impatient to sit through a 3-min clip, then read a few of these words: 

“With patient and firm determination, I’m going to press on for jobs. I’m going to press on for equality. I’m going to press on for the sake of our children. I’m going to press on for the sake of all those families who are struggling right now. I don’t have time to feel sorry for myself. I don’t have time to complain. I’m going to press on. I expect all of you to march with me, and press on. Take off your bedroom slippers, put on your marching shoes, shake it off, stop complaining, stop grumbling, stop crying, we are going to press on, we’ve got work to do.”

TAKE OFF YOUR BEDROOM SLIPPERS, PUT ON YOUR MARCHING SHOES, SHAKE IT OFF, STOP COMPLAINING...WE ARE GOING TO PRESS ON, WE'VE GOT WORK TO DO.

Them's fightin' words, bubba.

And that ain't all.

In this speech before the Congressional Black Caucus, Obama's call to arms rang with the cadence and rhythms of an old-time preacher-man, and believe me, he was not preaching to the choir. Liberals have long complained that Obama was catering too much, going too far to compromise, giving too much to the Righ-Wing lunatics that have taken over the Republican asylum.

After giving some examples of "bad kind of crazy," such as Republicans demanding that the poor and Middle Class pay more taxes while the rich go free (sometimes, literally--G.E. paid NO income tax last year)--Obama spoke for a minute on what he called "the good kind of crazy":

“Throughout our history, change has often come slowly. Progress often takes time,” he said. “It’s never easy. And I never promised easy. Easy has never been promised to us. But we have had faith. We’ve had that good kind of crazy that says, ‘You can’t stop marching.’”

I NEVER PROMISED EASY.

This is true. If you go over speech after speech the president has given, both before he was elected, and since, particularly when speaking to his supporters, he has repeated often the refrain that we inherited a tsunami of economic ruin from his predecessor, and it will take time to dig our way out of it. He's also always been honest with his supporters--from back in the day when the biggest dragon to slay was Hillary Clinton's primary-fight juggernaut--that it would not be easy for any of us. 

And Lord knows he was right on that score.

This is not the first speech the president has given of late that leaves scorch marks on the ears of his listeners. He signaled the New Obama at the speech he gave to a joint session of Congress on the American Jobs Act, in which he repeated the refrain, "Pass this Jobs Bill" 16 times, and the word "jobs" some 45 times.

In this speech, he called upon Congress to set aside petty partisan political differences--what he called, "the political circus,"  and come together for the greater good:

"As we stand at this crossroads of history, the eyes of all people in all nations are once again upon us – watching to see what we do with this moment; waiting for us to lead.

"Those of us gathered here tonight have been called to govern in extraordinary times. It is a tremendous burden, but also a great privilege – one that has been entrusted to few generations of Americans. For in our hands lies the ability to shape our world for good or for ill.

"I know that it is easy to lose sight of this truth – to become cynical and doubtful; consumed with the petty and the trivial.

"But in my life, I have also learned that hope is found in unlikely places; that inspiration often comes not from those with the most power or celebrity, but from the dreams and aspirations of Americans who are anything but ordinary."

Almost immediately, Obama supporters--both loyal standbys and disgruntled former fans--knew that this speech was not just flowery words, but a departure from his previous tone and method, as pointed out by Jonathan Capeheart in the Washington Post:

"[H]e sold it hard. The refrain, “Pass this jobs bill,” went from being a repeated line in a speech to a hammer over the head of Congress."

And he didn't just stop with the speech. The very next day, the president hit the ground running, going straight to areas not only hardest-hit by Bush's Great Recession--but were represented by some of his most powerful rivals in the Republican House and Senate.

As Jonathan Cohn points out in the New Republic, it's not just that the president is hitting economically vulnerable areas sensitive to Republican manipulations, and it's not just that he keeps repeating, "Pass this Jobs Bill" at every stop, and repeating key elements of the speech he gave to Congress--it's also that when he talks about such things as putting on your "marching shoes," he is reaching out over the heads of most casual listeners and straight into the hearts of his supporters, reminding them that he cannot do this alone. 

He needs our help, and he needs the help of all Americans who think this plan is a good one, and it turns out, a whopping majority do.--74% to 21% according to some polls, and even 56% in the most Conservative-run polling.

As Cohn says, we can do our part to help:

"The only hope for getting something through Congress -- or making an effective political statement, if the Republicans block action – is to apply pressure."

This is all well and good, Liberals say, but what took him so long? Liberals have done a great deal of moaning and groaning over the fact that the president has not sounded this tone sooner.

As usual, they are not looking at the Big Picture. I could explain it, but I'll let Jonathan Capeheart of the Washington Post have another shot:

"[H]e did try to follow through on his promise to do things differently. He tried hard to work with congressional Republicans. As a gesture of good faith, Obama far too often made concessions to the GOP before getting to the negotiating table. Moves that enraged his base, especially when he got nothing in return. As many have noted, he tried over and over again to be the reasonable guy at the table, the adult in the room. And it got him — and the country — nowhere."

So WHY DO IT AT ALL? howl the Liberal faction of the Democratic Party. 

Because he HAD to. President Obama is not the president of the Democratic Party, as much as Michael Moore and others like him want him to be--they often complain that he didn't do what George W. Bush OF ALL PEOPLE did when he came into office.

Remember that, Libs? How he came in after the U.S. Supreme Court selected him president and behaved as if he had some kind of sweeping mandate to impose Right-Wing Rule on the country? Remember how he used executive orders to erase and/or ignore parts of laws that he didn't like--more than any other president? Remember how he used it to ram through the tax cuts for the wealthy that have added more than a trillion bucks to the national debt? Remember how he immediately overturned anything of Clinton's he didn't like--such as birth control being included in women's health care in Third World countries we were helping?

Let's not even START on how he finessed two wars, among other delights.

I felt like a prisoner of war during those years, like some kind of hostage being held in an unfriendly country. I was horrified at every single thing that administration did. I felt helpless and hopeless and filled with rage--and it was the very boneheadedness of the Bush administration and their flat-out refusal to admit that there was anything whatsoever going wrong with their Big Glorious War in Iraq that ushered in the Democratic takeover of the House and Senate in 2006.

Remember THAT?

So. Now you think President Obama should behave in just that way. Imagine how HALF THE COUNTRY would feel if he did?

He HAD TO TRY.

No one could have anticipated that the Republican Party would set as their primary agenda, spending four years doing everything in their power to get rid of Barack Obama. They have shown, time and again, that they do not care about this country or what happens to her people--all they care about is Stopping Obama.

Now, he could have whined and complained every time he was in front of the cameras about how mean the Republicans were being, or as Cohn pointed out, he could do his damndest to at least try to find some kind of middle ground.

SOMEBODY had to be the adult!

These great battles are being played out in a country-wide tableau--not just on Rachel Maddow or Keith Olbermann but everywhere.

And the American people are watching. If they did not GET IT before as to just what the GOP Teapublicans were trying to do, it came through loud and clear during the debt ceiling fight. It made no difference whether you had heard the term before or had a clue as to what the hell it meant, but one thing did reverberate from that crises: THE REPUBLICANS WERE WILLING TO ALLOW EVEN THE MILITARY GO WITHOUT PAY IN ORDER TO MAKE THEIR PARTISAN POLITICAL POINT.

This provided the president just the public scenario he needed--not just to permit himself to show the anger he's tried to keep in check for more than two years--but to go over the heads of Congress and straight to the hearts of the American people with his message--and they are listening.

Cohn says:

"After the Democrats lost control of the House in the 2010 midterm elections, emboldened Republicans blocked Obama at every turn, even on measures the GOP once supported. The heart-stopping fight to raise the debt ceiling — and the inability of Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) to garner support in his caucus for the “grand bargain” he was cobbling together with the president — marked the end of Obama 1.0."

In spite of what some pundits would have you believe, what you see in Obama now is not a cynical ploy to rev up his disgruntled base. If he has proven one thing time and again, he has proven that he is president of ALL the people, and he knows that these obstructionist tactics of the Right-Wing lunatics who've taken over the Republican asylum are hurting EVERYONE in this country, not just HIM.

Plenty of Tea-Baggers, for example, depend upon Social Security and Medicare and/or Veterans benefits to survive. They can bark at him and howl at the moon all they want to, but if the candidates they support take over this government, the security they count on will disappear, and the corporations really will take over the country.

You have to understand--this isn't just a fight to re-elect President Obama. This isn't about reaching out to his "base" and garnering more votes.

This is a struggle--a life-and-death STRUGGLE--for the soul of America.

Again and again in his speeches, from the beginning of his presidency, Obama has said that these hateful policies that bleed the poor at the behest of the rich "are not who we are as Americans."

Again and again, he has pointed out that although America is a land known for rugged individualism--it is also a country known for working together, collectively, to achieve great things, not just for this country and her people, but for the whole world.

It was Americans who rebuilt Europe after World War II, through the Marshall Plan.

It was Americans who stopped the genocide in the Balkans.

I could go on and on but I hope you see my point here--we come together for glorious things like putting a man on the moon or whipping the Nazis--but we also come together as a great nation to hold one another up and to see to it that our poor and struggling are not kicked to the curb as they are in so many Third World countries.

That's not who we are.

The Republican debates, on the other hand, have drawn a clear picture of the Tea Bagger America they support, and it is an ugly place.

And I'm not talking about the candidates who are running--a field of crazies if I ever saw one--I am talking about the crowds who support them. There are three well-known examples, but just in case you live in a cave and have somehow missed this glaring evidence of the kind of soul America would have under a President Perry or a President Bachmann, here are three--a new one practically every week:

At the first Republican debate, the moderators pointed out that under Governor Rick Perry's reign in the state of Texas, some 234 inmates have been put to death--more than ALL THE OTHER STATES COMBINED. While Perry preened, the crowd cheered wildly. Never mind that the Innocence Project has overseen the release of dozens of Death Row inmates across the country who were wrongly convicted, or even that Perry himself not only oversaw the execution of a man who was almost assuredly innocent, but then hurried to squelch and cover up the resulting investigation into the wrongful death. To the Tea Bagger crowd at the debates, Perry was a hero.

A week later, a debate moderator asked the potential Republican candidate, Ron Paul, if he would allow a 30-year old man in a coma to die if he was without health insurance. Before Mr. Paul could even respond, the crowd began to cheer, and a couple of loud voices cried out, "Yeah!" and "Let him die!"

What was not mentioned at that point, since apparently the debate moderator, Wolf Blitzer, didn't know, was that Ron Paul's own former campaign manager had died of cancer without health insurance, while still in his 40's, leaving his wife and children destitute. The Paul campaign had had a fund-raiser for the man, to help with the staggering medical bills.

But the real topper came in the last Republican debate, in which a video was shown of an American soldier who was, at the time, deployed to Iraq, who admitted on-camera that he was gay, and asked if HE should be kicked out of the military for that, even as he served his country in combat in a foreign land.

As candidate Rick Santorum rambled through his incoherent response, the crowd BOOED THE SOLDIER and then, cheered the nonsensical remarks of Mr. Santorum, which included statements along the line that "sex doesn't belong in the military"--a fact which should come as a surprise to the men and women service members who are married to one another.

These are the same people, by the way, who trashed the honorable record of Senator John Kerry in the 2004 campaign and viciously attacked ANYONE who even so much as QUESTIONED the Bushian justifications for the Iraq war because they were not "supporting the troops."

So...we're only supposed to support those troops who we approve of?

As Ana Marie Cox points out in the U.K. Guardian, these disturbing--and disgusting--examples of the Teapublican crowd mentality reveal something far deeper and darker about this struggle for the soul of America: 

"What the hell is happening out there? Polls show that Republican voters aren't that excited about their candidates. Then is the exuberance that would be applied to an individual campaign spilling out into indiscriminate exclamations over policy? If so, how come we can't get more vocalising on behalf of the party's less ugly philosophies: three cheers for reducing the corporate income tax! When I say "state", you say "rights!"

[...]


"But what should concern the GOP is how their audiences' reactions distort platforms and campaigns. A 2007 study showed that cheering influenced positively – and measurably – a viewing audience's perception of a candidate's performance. If the campaigns proceed and profit from these unruly, even uncivilised outbreaks, the party will get pulled further and further from the core of its appeal to moderates, which used to be that Republicans are the people who will let you be."

Yes, the GOP SHOULD be concerned by those things, but they are not.

They pandered to the Tea Bagger vote in 2010 and now, they seem to have allowed a small handful of freshmen House members--the lowest politicians on the totem pole in normal times--take over the entire government, signing pledges to unelected Right-Wing pontificators that they honor ahead of their own oaths to uphold the Constitution of the United States--and ahead of their own constituents. (Believe me, none of these guys won by landslides, and most will only serve one term.)

So, because of this cockeyed insanity on the part of the party in opposition to the President, the entire country is being held hostage to the most extremist of views on things which affect all of us.

The president had to show the country that he was willing to do whatever it took to do his job, keep the government running, and work with the crazies--and in return, they took this country to the very brink of economic catastrophe.

THIS woke people up. THIS made them realize that this is not what government is supposed to be. Over and over again, polling showed that the American people wanted even their elected Right-Wingers to compromise in order to keep government functioning, and over and over again, the wishes of the majority of the American people were IGNORED in favor of the insanity that now reigns in the Republican party.

THIS is when the president stepped up. THIS is when he said, "ENOUGH."

THIS is when he got his mojo back.

He is fighting for all of us, you see, not just his Party "base." He is fighting for the soul of this nation. He knows we are better than this. We are not the kind of people to allow a young man to die just to prove a partisan political point, or to boo a soldier who is fighting for his country in a foreign land. We are not the kind of people to slavishly sacrifice the Better Good of millions of people in order to satisfy the greed a few hundred of the wealthiest Americans.

As Paul Begala wrote so eloquently in Newsweek/The Daily Beast, there are many things about the United States government that perform splendidly, that we all rely on each and every day.

So, the president knows that he is fighting for all of us--and it's working.

As David Axelrod explained in a memo to supporters:

"According to a CNN poll released on Wednesday, a plurality of Americans approve of the President’s jobs plan. Two thirds believe we should cut taxes for the middle class and rebuild America’s roads and bridges. Three quarters believe we need to put our teachers and first responders back to work. More Americans trust the President to handle the economy than Congressional Republicans by a margin of 9 points."

So the American people are solidly behind their president--even as Republicans dig themselves in deeper, refusing even to sign on to disaster relief until huge cuts are made in programs that are popular to Democrats--and threatening, for the third time this year, to shut the government down over their recalcitrance.

The American people know this is not right. They know that only a small sliver of the populace supports these draconian tactics. They know the president has bent over backwards to work with these people, to no avail. 

And they know that he is fighting for them. And so should we be, too. The man needs SOMEBODY to have his back against the constant, relentless onslaught of criticism from the opposition party:

"I’m going to press on for the sake of all those families who are struggling right now. I don’t have time to feel sorry for myself. I don’t have time to complain. I’m going to press on. I expect all of you to march with me, and press on. Take off your bedroom slippers, put on your marching shoes, shake it off, stop complaining, stop grumbling, stop crying, we are going to press on, we’ve got work to do.”

THIS is the struggle for the soul of the American people. Who are we, as a nation and as a people? Who do we want to represent us on the world stage? Who do we want to know is working for us, each and every day, from the White House?

At this point, it makes little difference who the Republicans nominate. They have already demonstrated their character and beliefs. They will let people suffer and die and will boo men and women in uniform if it means they can protect the rich and give religious zealots the final say in how our country is governed.

This is not who we are. Barack Obama knows that. He's got his mojo back, and so do we, my friends. So do we.








 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 9/25/2011 11:47 PM Booth McKeown wrote:
      Deannie, I'm feeling very much the same. I think Boehner's failure to reach the Grand Bargain freed Obama. I'm just not sure it's in time. It seems the center of gravity has shifted from Washington to Wall Street, and I've been stunned to see all the different "Occupy" movements springing from the Occupy Wall Street protest. And I'm seeing very, very little mainstream coverage so far. I'm seeing a lot of parallels to the Egyptian revolution, though thankfully not as violent yet. I cannot understand why the networks and CNN are giving this virtually no coverage, unless it's the corporatocracy we've been bemoaning -- there are precious few truly independent news sources in this country any more. I feel blind and a bit puzzled but I've done the best research I could all day today, looking at different websites and different facebook pages. I am not sure the revolution has begun. But I'm not sure it HASN'T begun either. I hope Obama can get out in front of all this restless energy and hopefully help us channel it into constructive, meaningful, and lasting change in a reasonable amount of time.
      Reply to this
      1. 9/26/2011 7:52 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        It's not too late, and I'll tell you why, my friend. Most of America is still not paying attention. It's too early for most of them to be thinking of the presidential race, for one thing, and for another, so many of them are just living paycheck to paycheck, surviving.  They only pay attention when there is a CRISES.

        Most Americans have no idea what a debt ceiling is or even what the argument was all about, but enough of it filtered through the fog to let most of them know that the Republicans were playing politics with the credit rating of the United States, and that Wall Street was plummeting as a result, which was wiping out half the retirement savings of most of them. They could see that the president was bending over backward to try and please those people, but they were extremists and still demanding all-or-nothing. 

        Most people don't live their lives that way. They compromise every day of their lives. They compromise their dreams, they compromise in their workplaces, they compromise in their marriages, and they compromise with their children. This made it pretty clear to them that, even though they didn't really understand what everybody was talking about, the president WAS being an adult who was dealing with rebellious teenagers, and I think, at this time, a tipping-point was reached, across the board. Even conservatives were frustrated.

        THEN, the president did something I have not seen a Democrat do in 30 years--even through presidential campaigns and administrations: HE SEIZED MESSAGE CONTROL. We have been reacting to the Right and  allowing them to set the agenda ever since Ronald Reagan was in office--we've been on the defensive even through the Clinton years. Do you think the very first thing he had planned to deal with in his honeymoon days of his brand-new administration was gays in the military? Of course not. This was their snotty way of seizing the agenda, and from that point on, the agenda was theirs. 

        But for the first time, THIS president took it away from them and put THEM on the ropes. When he came out swinging at the joint session of congress, he looked like a leader, like a grown-up, like the PRESIDENT, and ever since then, the more he hammers home the message, the more like children they appear. I think he will ram this home and I still believe it's possible he will pull out a landslide and we will retake the House, for the simple reason that THEY WENT TOO FAR. They always do.

        And if THAT happens, it will be the death knell of the Tea Baggers as political  power-brokers, and the pendulum will slowly begin to swing back toward the Center.

        As far as the Wall Street protests are concerned; I, too, am deeply disturbed that the news ignores this major protest while they send live news crews down to slavishly follow 50 Tea-Baggers around the D.C. mall. But keep in mind, in all your research--these are committed activists, and those of us who care the most deeply are also committed activists. The American people are still not paying that much attention, and wouldn't even if it dominated the news. So their message is not being lost, per se. Give it time. Give this president time to continue his rope-a-dope strategy and to build his momentum and gather up his scattered followers.

        Some revolutions are quiet, you know, but that does not mean they are not happening.

        Reply to this
    • 9/26/2011 10:03 AM Ron Carson wrote:
      Very nice, very nice indeed. Once again you nailed it. I really don't think that the President has a more passionate, knowledgeable, and ardent supporter than you my friend. Every time my forehead reads "tilt" because of the constant barrage of bullshit that is hurled at this President, you come along to restore my sanity. I thank you for that. Since I'm Black and male I obviously have a very different perspective than you, and perhaps even your entire group of friends, relatives, and associates. I bristle and even get angry when I witness the disrespect that is visited upon this President, and thankfully you come along to help restore my sanity. Thanx, and don't quit!
      Reply to this
      1. 9/26/2011 10:29 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Thank you so much, my good friend, I appreciate that. Yes, you do have a different perspective than me, but not my entire group of friends, cuz you're not my only African American friend ha ha. Seriously though, my black friends and I speak so often about this--about my belief (which they validate) that overt racism may be illegal now, but it has gone covert. It's there, say my friends, when a cashier signals to a white person standing in line BEHIND them, or when they get pulled over by police, or when they have to work--as one of my friends' mama said, "1,000 times harder" to achieve their goals and dreams. 

        I've always said that the way to eventually eliminate even covert racism is for white folks to speak out loud and clear whenever they see an injustice--even one so unnoticeable as saying, "Sorry, but she was ahead of me in line"--and to howl at the moon when it's worse.

        That's what I do. I'm a good howler. ;-D

        Reply to this
        1. 9/26/2011 11:05 AM Ron Carson wrote:
          Don't quit!
          Reply to this
          1. 9/26/2011 12:20 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
            I won't quit 'til President Obama completes his second term.
            Reply to this
    • 9/26/2011 5:33 PM Patty Kivlen Duckrey wrote:
      Brilliant once again, Deanie!!! Why are you not writing for the NYT or the Washington Post, or the LA Times??? I hope you are sending these blogs as letters to the editor of these papers! I am so thrilled I found you...I hope it's okay that I share this on facebook. All the best to you and yours and hope that things are getting better where you live, and the GREEN is coming back!!! You are FABULOUS!!!
      Reply to this
      1. 9/26/2011 6:11 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Thank you SOOO much! 

        As far as the major papers are concerned, they have very strict word-limit requirements (not one syllable over 800, and this is waay over that), and although I've sent carefully-submitted within-the-wordcount op-eds to them, I have been rejected each time. Haven't done it in a while, though.

        We're not getting much green around here, I'm sorry to report. The ongoing extreme drought conditions have prevented the kind of long, soaking rain the pastures need to regenerate, and these particular wildfires that went through our part of the state were so incredibly HOT that they burned the grass roots as well as the plants. This is highly unusual; in fact, controlled burns are often used in agriculture to get rid of brush and encourage regrowth. But these fires were just hellish. It's going to take us 3 to 5 years for the grasses and pastures to regenerate--unless we get some kind of miracle-rain, and it's going to take 20 to 30 years for the trees to grow back.

        Reply to this
      2. 9/26/2011 6:16 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        I completely forgot to mention, YES BY ALL MEANS please share my blogposts on Facebook, or Twitter, or by e-mail, or anywhere you please. It's why I write them. And thank you for asking!
        Reply to this
        1. 9/26/2011 10:06 PM Ron Carson wrote:
          You really should be writing for the times or post or someone if that ilk, because I've not read a better witter than you. I mean that for what it's worth!
          Reply to this
          1. 9/27/2011 8:21 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
            You GUYS. Thanks. You keep me going. *group hug*
            Reply to this
    • 9/27/2011 3:46 AM Nigel wrote:
      One wears marching BOOTS, not shoes. One can kick bigger arse (ass for you colonials) with boots.

      Unless the world's politicians get their arses in gear, we're in for much worse in the way of recession and associated drop in our living standard.
      Reply to this
      1. 9/27/2011 8:23 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
        I wish I didn't have to agree, my friend, but I do. :-/
        Reply to this
        1. 9/28/2011 2:34 AM Nigel wrote:
          Unfortunately, politicians work on the Lincolnshire Police method of leadership which is "indecision is the key to flexibility."

          There is no doubt in my mind that the situation in what I'll call "the west" IS going to get a lot worse because of the procrastination and lack of action on the part of our governments. Just look at what is happening in Greece. When that country defaults on its debt, followed by Spain and Italy, the brown and sticky is going to hit the fan big time. The worst thing is, the politicians and bankers who got us into this mess have so much money the disaster will not affect them. The governments will just cut spending and put up taxes because "we're all in this together" while failing to mention that they are cushioned from the effects of an economic downturn. Then they may just as well p1$$ into the wind for all the good their interventions will do.
          Reply to this
          1. 9/28/2011 10:01 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
            Here in the States, we had a similar economic debacle in the '80s (again, a conservative Republican administration)--with the Savings and Loan industry. And there were widespread prosecutions across the board. People went to jail. The same thing happened when junk bond traders were found out.

            But over the past 15 years or so, the banking industry has bought and sold congress so many times over that they have, quite literally, written the laws that are supposed to oversee their own businesses. Consequently, there have been NO repercussions for what they did to us--and to the world--over the past 8 or 10 years. With the spectacular exception of Bernie Madoff in NY city, there have been virtually no prosecutions and no accountability for the wholesale gambling binge that went on. Even after taxpayers bailed them out, very few heads rolled, and those that did, left their cushy jobs with humongous Golden Parachutes in the tens of millions of dollars, suffering virtually no consequences for their greed and recklessness.

            We've had 10 years of the Bush tax cuts, and where are the jobs that the conservatives swear are being created by them? Big Business is sitting on TRILLIONS in capitol, and using it to streamline their businesses, laying off more people and asking the beleagured ones who are left to do the job of three people. Wall Street is flush and shareholders are fat and happy.

            But the Middle Class is vanishing and poverty is spreading at an exponential rate, while the worst partisan politics I have ever seen in my life has congress completely gridlocked. I have never in my lifetime seen an opposition party decide that their ONLY job is to get rid of the encumbent president. Never. They would bankrupt the country if it would make them look better in the polls.

            It is a horrendous situation, and until Big Business gets it through their thick skulls that prosperity for all means more consumers for their goods, they will keep counting their gold and trying to bring back the Roaring Twenties when the robber baron was king.

            Reply to this
            1. 9/30/2011 5:38 AM Nigel wrote:
              Don't fool yourself. Bankers & politicians will get through alright because they have the resources to withstand the huge depression that is looming. Our life style is about to take a hit of at least 25% IMHO. Those people with their own businesses catering to necessities should be able to cope. Those in medium class "luxury goods" sectors or working for others are in for hard time. Obviously purveyors of high end bling etc will be fine because any recession will not affect the wealthiest.
              Reply to this
              1. 9/30/2011 9:06 AM Deanie Mills wrote:
                I have a family member who was unemployed for almost two years--a highly qualified, professional person who had been making a good living. This person just found a job working in a high-end jewelry/diamond store, and although it's hourly wage plus commissions, the person who did the hiring said that they had felt NO recession repercussions. I explained that, according to what I have read on the American economy, this is true. While the Middle Class struggles to stay out of poverty and the poor get destitute, those in the upper echelons, who've been raking in the dough hand over fist over the past decade and managed to sidestep any problems to speak of after the 2007-8 crash, are keeping luxury-goods items in hot demand: diamonds, vacation homes, yachts, and so on. They are spending like the proverbial drunken sailors while the rest of us struggle to survive. Bottom line: Working in a high-end jewelry store is probably a safe job, believe it or not.
                Reply to this
    • 10/1/2011 6:33 AM Nigel wrote:
      I'm working in a DIY store two days a week at present. I took voluntary redundancy from the school I worked at for five years as my police pension fortunately covers expenses. I am alos learning how to earn money internet marketing. I earned £22.89 last month and it only cost me £300 to do it! Having said that, the earnings are starting to go up and I shall be able to cut some costs over the next two months. Plan 'A' is that I will be breaking even by the end of November. Once that happens, profits should start increasing quite rapidly until I am making a good living from the interweb.
      Reply to this
      1. 10/1/2011 2:34 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        That's great, Nigel. I hope that works out for you. Now you can work out of your home and drive your wife crazy ha ha
        Reply to this
    • 10/2/2011 3:13 AM Nigel wrote:
      One of my gifts is that I can drive people crazy from a distance. However, I prefer to have them as a passenger in my car (auto for you colonials reading this). Just ask Gail Kruggel.

      A bit over 100 years ago, most Brits had their own businesses in some shape, fashion or form. Today it's down to something like 30%. Trusting somebody else with your livelihood is a bigger gamble than having one's own business these days, IMHO.
      Reply to this
      1. 10/2/2011 5:01 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Well I think that's true in this country too. Especially for the "99ers"--those people unemployed for at least 99 weeks. Many of them have started their own businesses because there is no more unemployment insurance for them and they've lost their homes and it's their only hope.

        I was talking to my husband about this. His dad recently passed away at 92. He had worked for 35 years for the same company, had retired with a nice six-figure package, and had continued to work for five or six years after that as a private contractor for his old employer. His retirement package included FULL health care insurance even after the age he would've qualified for Medicare. At the time he got that retirement package, the life span was shorter; as it is he lived many years after that. In the last ten years of his life, he had ten major surgeries--paid for *100%* by that amazing retirement package, which prolonged his life considerably--and when he passed away, he still had money to leave his children and grandchildren.

        And I was pointing out to my husband that this sort of thing simply no longer exists. NO ONE retires with health insurance anymore, for one thing, and for another, nowadays you are forced to change jobs every five or six years even if you don't want to, and even THEN, your retirement package is likely to be ravaged by the roller-coaster fluctuations of the stock market. So Baby Boomers are being forced to work well past retirement age, and even when forced to retire, they start businesses or even go so far as to be Wal-Mart greeters--anything to supplement their lousy incomes. And the Republicans in congress want to jack around with the only successful govt health care in this country--Medicare. As it is, they've extended the eligibility age several times. So many retirement-aged people don't yet even HAVE health care. They are jacking around with their required medications, cutting doses, doing without, because they don't yet qualify for help with prescription drugs.

        And if the Republicans have their way, they'll eliminate Social Security altogether, which is, for many seniors, the only kind of retirement funds they have to keep them from complete devastation.

        Reply to this
    • 12/9/2011 6:10 PM Kathleen Chieffi wrote:
      I know this doesn't belong here in comments, but so many (lesser) female novelists books are being made into tv movies, is there ANY hope yours might be picked up now?? please, please? I read them all and wish there were new ones but understand that you've moved on, but with the new use of cable tv for mini series and tv movies, we could enjoy your work again! Kathleen (from old compuserve chat room!)
      Reply to this
      1. 12/10/2011 1:49 PM Deanie Mills wrote:
        Hi Kathleen! I'm sorry I'm only just now replying to you--I've been offline for the better part of a week. I've had two books optioned for TV movies; my first book, DARKROOM, and ORDEAL. Ordeal was optioned specifically for Lifetime, and the producer who optioned it had a couple of movies in the pipeline already. After that, we never heard from her again; I'm not sure why. It's a mixed blessing. I shudder to think what Lifetime would do to that book. The producer who optioned DARKROOM was just never able to find a market for it, but yes, that was before the proliferation of TV movies on cable. It's my hope to figure out all the intricacies of rereleasing old out-of-print books into e-books. I'm looking into it now, but it's a detailed process. You have to get permission from  your original publishers, first. Then you have to reformat the whole thing. So I'll have to purchase a pretty high-end printer/scanner which will enable me to scan in the pages directly from the books and have them converted into a Word document. THEN the document itself has to be reformatted for e-publication, which uses different margins and that sort of thing. Pretty time-consuming process for 11 books. There are people who will take care of all that for you, for a price. A fairly hefty one, and I've got at least 10 books that I want to republish. I'm also working on a memoir and would like to finish that one first. Keep dropping in to Blue Inkblots, and/or friend me on Facebook or follow me on Twitter, and I'll be posting updates as I have them. Thank you so much for your support! It's most welcome, these days!
        Reply to this
    Leave a comment

    Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

     Website

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.